The Episcopal Church of Scotland still has put HIV / AIDS on the cover of its December newsletter ... © Scotland.anglican.org.

(Blogmensgo, December 14, 2011) The Episcopal Church of Scotland told the Scottish Government on December 6, 2011, that it would refuse to perform marriages between same sex couples. A week earlier it’s colleague the Presbyterian church gave a similar response, as was done before the leaders of Muslim and Catholic Scotland.

[Summary | Detailed Response (PDF)]

The leaders of all persuasions have responded negatively to the possible celebration of gay and lesbian marriages among their flock. These negative responses are the result of a consultation launched three months ago by the Scottish Government on the acceptance of gay marriage by the civil and religious authorities.

The Episcopal Church of Scotland, which claims 40,000 followers, bases its doctrine on a canon stating that marriage is the “physical, spiritual and mystic union of a man and woman, created by the mutual consent of their heart, their spirit and their will, as a sacred bond of a lifetime instituted by God.” Episcopalians and leaders indicate that they are “opposed to the enactment of the marriage between same sex, whether on religious or civil.”

In the same response to the government, the Episcopal hierarchy refuses to celebrate religious civil partnerships, arguing that the case does not look that civilian authorities.

But the Episcopal Church of Scotland will not change his mind if the Anglican Church, to which it belongs, takes a different final decision. The Anglican bishops feel they have not yet had time to settle the question definitively. Where appropriate, a full or partial reversal of the Episcopal Church of Scotland remains an option.

According to the article that I use as a source, “the Episcopal Church of Scotland had once seemed to take a more liberal option on the question of homosexuality. In particular it argued that the fact of being a homosexual couple was not a barrier to ordination to the clergy. ”

Religious communities and religious officials will not be forced to perform same sex marriages even if gay marriage were legal, said the Scottish Government. In England and Scotland, heterosexual civil marriages can be celebrated and formalized in places of worship rather than the town hall if both bride and groom want.

This article has been translated from our French blog, the view the original version please click here.

Matt & Philca / MensGo

(via La Croix (in french) of December 8, 2011)

 

To share, bookmark, send or print this text (click for extra choices)
 

Minister Manu Sareen. Hunk gay-friendly. © Flickr / Ditte Valente.

(Blogmensgo, November 29, 2011) The first same-sex marriages should be celebrated in Denmark by the summer of 2012. Manu Sareen, Minister for Equality and the Church since October 3, 2011, will file a bill to that effect in Parliament. It will take about six months to enact the law and its implementing decree.

Legalizing gay marriage will delete concomitant PACS (or “registered partnership” according to local terminology), that Denmark was the first country to establish. The Minister Sareen’s announcement comes after the death of activist Axel Axgil on October 29, 2011, who had PACS (Eigil and his companion, who died in 1995) on 1 October 1989, that is to say the same day that the PACS came into force in Denmark.

The homosexual and heterosexual couples have exactly the same rights and their union will be uniformly designated by the word marriage. Homosexual couples can adopt children after two years (see our article in the March 18, 2009) and the Lutheran pastors who wish are allowed since 1997 to bless the little pacs by truncating the ritual of marriage.

Protestantism has a status of state religion in Denmark, where the Lutheran church claims more than 80% of the population among its faithful. The previously refused obedience same-sex marriages, although most of its bishops are in favor of marriage between gays or lesbians.

The Bishop of Copenhagen, Peter Skov-Jakobsen, welcomes this new “political decision”, while saying he understands that some people resent the predicted demise of the statutory differences between married couples and civil unions. Last year, 63% of Danes were in favor of religious marriage of homosexual couples (see our article in the March 10, 2010).

Manu Sareen. The Minister also likes pink balloons. © Flickr / Bo Knudsen Nissen / Hovedstadens Radikale Venstre.

The text of the future marriage law should provide a number of details concerning the rights and duties of spouses and how marriages are celebrated. The pastors who wish will probably not allowed to gay marriages, but the Lutheran Church must find replacements for their blessing marriages between same sex.

By consulting the English Wikipedia file of the Minister Manu Sareen, I see it “was named Politician of the Year in 2003, 2006 and 2007 by the Association LGBT Danmark”. It is also the first man having been appointed Minister for Equality in Denmark.

This article has been translated from our French blog.  To view the original article, click here.

Philca & Matt / MensGo
(via Le Figaro du 23 novembre 2011)

To share, bookmark, send or print this text (click for extra choices)
 

Patrick Leahy (Vermont), champion of gay marriage. But the opponents are tough. © Leahy.senate.gov / DR.

(Blogmensgo, November 17, 2011) On the 10th of November 2011, the Senate Committee on Justice voted, eight by ten votes against a bill (S. 598) to repeal the current law on defense of marriage (Doma) prohibiting the U.S. recognition of same-sex marriages at the federal level. The bill, introduced by Dianne Feinstein, Democratic senator from California, can now be presented for adoption in plenary session at a date has not yet been set.

The law of 1996 Doma provides that only marriage unites a man and a woman. But there are 131,000 same-sex couples legally married in the United States. Gay marriage is actually legal in the capital Washington and in six states (Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Vermont). But the law prevents these 1100 Doma couples legally married to claim family allowances, health insurance, tax benefits, pensions or grants of federal origin, which transforms the de facto second-class married.

The bill must be passed by the Senate and the House of Representatives before being promulgated by the Head of State. If the federal Senate is controlled by Democrats, the House is a Republican stronghold. The Senate committee chaired by Patrick Leahy (news releases before and after the vote), a state senator from gay-friendly, Vermont, voted to put the text to the agenda in the plenary. Its likely adoption by the Senate is likely to remain purely symbolic, since it will then be confirmed after the election by the members.

[The English can watch the video of the meeting of the Senate Committee, starts at about 21:00. To listen and edit sound, as the Chairman of the Committee is a little hoarse.]

The main supporters of a repeal of the DOMA law are President Barack Obama, a majority of elected Democrats (including Democratic senators ten members of the commission of Justice), a small minority of elected Republicans, a group of 70 large companies (including Google, Nike and Xerox) and cataloged many organizations on the left. Opponents of the repeal are recruited especially among elected Republicans, the religious lobbies, organizations traditionalists, the extreme right movements and a small minority of elected Democrats.

This article has been translated from the original on our french blog.  To view the original, click here.

Matt & Philca / MensGo

via Los Angeles Times

 

 

 

 

To share, bookmark, send or print this text (click for extra choices)
© 2011 MensGo's Gay Blog Any reproduction strictly forbidden unless written permission Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha